[ad_1]
The new federal budget promises good things will happen at the Department of National Defence … next year, and hopefully in the years after.
The new fiscal plan, presented Tuesday by Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland, marks a subtle but significant shift from what was proposed in last week’s long-awaited defence policy, which committed to spending an additional $8.1 billion on defence.
The funding envelope in the budget earmarks the same amount but includes not only the defence department but proposed spending on both the Communications Security Establishment — the country’s electronic spy agency — and Global Affairs Canada.
While the overall defence budget is expected to increase marginally in the current fiscal year to $33.8 billion, the internal cost-cutting exercise ordered by the Liberal government means the military can expect roughly $635 million less than what had been forecast in the 2023 federal budget.
Freeland’s fiscal plan projects a 30 per cent increase in defence spending next year.
The politically charged promise to increase Canada’s defence spending to 1.76 per cent of the gross domestic product by the end of the decade could be left in doubt when the spending plans are laid alongside the budget’s economic projections during that time frame.
Generally, the better the economy does, the more the defence budget would have to be increased to meet the target.
NATO expects member countries to set aside at least two per cent of their GDP for spending on the military. Allies have been pressuring Canada to come up with a plan to get to that target.
The federal budget does not lay out such a plan and does not address the two per cent benchmark.
Funding for several key pledges has been pushed down the road and won’t show up until the next budget year in 2025-26.
Money for military housing
The Liberals are promising to build 1,400 new military homes and renovate 2,500 other units to address an affordability crisis that has reduced some members of the military to living in vehicles.
But incremental funding for military housing doesn’t kick in until next year’s budget — and only $6.9 million is being set aside then, with $1.4 billion expected to be spent “in future years.”
The federal budget proposes turning some defence department property over to housing development.
“National Defence owns 622 properties across every province and territory, totalling 2.2 million hectares,” the budget document says. “In addition to providing housing to many members of the Canadian Armed Forces, many of these National Defence properties in cities and communities across Canada are not fully utilized and could be unlocked to build more homes for Canadian Armed Forces members, and civilians, to live in.”
![A soldier walks home with his groceries in front of the military housing at CFB Borden near Barrie, Ontario on Monday April 5, 1999.](https://i.cbc.ca/1.6604819.1713297718!/fileImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/original_780/canada-refugees.jpg)
Defence department properties in Halifax, Toronto and Victoria could be up for redevelopment. There are firm plans to divest 14 surplus defence properties “that have potential for housing and are not needed for National Defence operations,” says the budget document.
The defence policy pledges to hire more civilian staff in the department to help shepherd major projects through the system. While $149 million has been set aside over four years for that effort, the funding does not kick in until next year.
Funding for new military equipment — including new early warning aircraft to keep watch over the country’s Far North for missile attacks, and long-range missiles for the army — won’t see funding until next year as well.
The budget does earmark significant funds, starting this year, for maintaining old fleets, including the navy’s three-decade-old frigates.
Over the next five years, $1.9 billion will be spent to keep the frigate fleet afloat and to extend the lease on the navy’s privately contracted supply ship. Overall, the military is expected to need up to $8.2 billion for those ship life extensions because of the slow pace in delivering replacement warships and sustainment vessels.
[ad_2]
Source link